Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Parenthood

This week Tiffany and I review two of TV’s top dramas on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday: the returning favorite, Parenthood, and the new smash hit, Revenge.

I’ve complained once or twice about televisions depiction of family: the dopey father, shrill mothers, and bratty know-it-all children. Parenthood manages to present an image of family in several ways, none of them being the trite formula above.

The show follows the large Braverman family. Zeke (Craig T Nelson) and Camille (Bonnie Bedelia) are the parents of four grown children: Adam, Sara, Crosby, and Julia. Each of these children offer the opportunity to examine different aspects of the family dynamic.

Adam (Peter Krause), the eldest, is the responsible, successful, and happily married to his equally capable wife Kristina (Monica Potter) They have two children (as the series begins) Haddie and Max. Haddie is a fairly good teenager, but they find themselves entering new territory as their teenage daughter starts making changes that teenagers often do. To add to the madness in their home, the family discovers that their younger son, Max, has Asperger’s.

Sara (Lauren Graham), the next in line, seems to have taken the more free-spirited track in life, landing her back at home with her parents and two children, Amber, a teen who seems to be taking after her mother a little too much, and the very quiet younger brother, Drew.

Crosby (Dax Shepherd) is a small time record producer living on a houseboat, who also takes after the more free-spirited side of the family.  This life results in discovering he has a five year old son, Jabbar, when a former fling comes back to town to introduce them.

Last in line is Julia (Erika Christensen), a very together and successful corporate lawyer. Her husband, Joel (Sam Jaeger), is a stay-at-home Dad to their somewhat precocious only child, Sydney.

 

Got all that?

Now with all those characters, I thought for sure as this show began that many would be flat, one-dimensional. In reality, the writers have done a solid job giving each individual depth. What constantly amazes me is how the actors are able to act in a way that convinces you that these people are actually related. Even the smallest mannerisms can be seen from parent to child. Mae Whitman (who plays Amber) in particular is a stand out in how she can be a fully developed character of her own, but at the same time echo pieces of her fictional mother throughout the show.

The stories are varied, giving everyone watching the opportunity to relate somehow. Single parenting from both a full time and part time perspective, a full time mother dealing with a desire to have a career again, a full time dad coping with taking on the duties that are generally assumed to be a mom’s, grandparents speaking up (or standing aside) on issues involving their grandchildren; chances are, you’ll see yourself in one of these characters.

One aspect that has garnered both praise and criticism is the show’s depiction of Max (Max Burkholder), a child with Asperger’s. It should be noted that the creator of the show, Jason Katims (Friday Night Lights), based the character on his son, who also has Asperger’s. A behavioral psychologist is also consulted in the writing of Max’s scenes, and other consultants are brought in for more intense ones. My experience with Asperger’s is limited to a student I had some time ago, so I couldn’t tell you how accurate the show’s depiction is, but I can tell you that it certainly feels real, and I do appreciate the writer’s attempts at an accurate portrayal.

But what do I think of the show overall? Every week, I find myself getting teary. Whether it is a situation that I can directly relate to, or one that the actors and writers craft so well I can’t help but be emotionally invested, I’m glued to the screen.

Are the storylines action-packed? Not really. But they deliver a picture of family life, parenthood in particular, with all its faults and ultimately, its beauty.

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I come from a large, close family, or perhaps it is because I look forward to having a good cry with this show each week, I have to give it a GTV. A home cooked meal at a big table, surrounded by family you love.

Do you watch Parenthood? Which character do you find yourself relating to most? What situations really tug at your heart?

Don’t forget to see what Tiffany thinks of ABC’s Revenge.

Come back next week when we’ll have more TV for you!

Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag on Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future. 


A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:

GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Will Smash Live Up to the Hype?

This week on Why It’s Worth a Watch, Tiffany and I tune in to NBC and check out two new dramas, The Firm and Smash.

Can you guess which one I get to review?

If you haven’t heard of Smash you either a) fast forward through every commercial blindfolded or b) fell off the face of the planet for the two months leading up to the Super Bowl. NBC has been promoting this show to death leading up to it’s “Monday after the Super Bowl” premiere.

That’s a lot of hype, ya’ll.

The show is a look at the creation of a Broadway musical, as well as the lives of those involved, and how their lives are affected by theater life. It follows Julia (Debra Messing) and Tom (Christian Borle), fairly successful writers, as they work together on an idea for a musical about Marilyn Monroe.  As the idea turns into actual songs and concepts, we start meeting other key players needed to bring the musical to life: Eileen Rand (Anjelica Houston) as the producer, Derek Wills (Jack Davenport) as the womanizing director, and of course, the cast.

The big question is, who will play Marilyn?

Enter Ivy (Megan Hilty), a blonde bombshell with a voice to match. Experienced in the world of theater, but still looking to snag that big part, she seems to be a shoe in. Then there is Karen Cartwright (Katharine McPhee), a fresh faced girl from Iowa trying to break in to theater.

Both girls have the chops. But what will it take to get the part?

Without spoiling anything, you find out early on in the series who will be given the part, and given the scenes leading up to it, you will certainly have your thoughts on why. Yet, the show moves forward with the other girl in the ensemble and the idea that “anything can happen in the theater”.

At home, the various players deal with personal lives affected by theater. A boyfriend concerned about lecherous director-types, a husband wanting to adopt a child, the producer’s divorce and its hand in interfering; life in the theater never stays in just the theater.

The musical production on the show is great. The original songs sound like true Broadway, and with the talents of Hilty (a Wicked alum) and McPhee (an American Idol contestant) belting the new tunes, you can’t help but feel like you have a little musical theater in your living room. With other big Broadway names in the cast (Christian Borle, Brian D’Arcy James, Will Chase) you can’t help but be excited about the potential for song in the upcoming episodes.

Well, you can’t help it if you are a Broadway geek, anyhow.

The show has been labeled by some as the “adult Glee”, but I am hoping that it turns out to be more. The musical talent is well beyond that, but it remains to be seen if the writers will take the show beyond a showcase for singers and tales of the casting couch.

For that reason, I’m giving this show a SSTV. The ingredients are there for something really delicious, but the end result remains to be seen.

What do you think of Smash? Are you excited about Broadway on your TV? Have you connected with any of the characters yet?

Now click over to Tiffany’s blog and read her thoughts on The Firm. 

Come back next week when we flip networks and review two ABC new drama: Parenthood and Revenge.

Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future. 


A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:

GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – No Escape?

This week on Why It’s Worth a Watch, Tiffany and I get to discuss some brand new dramas, The Finder and Alcatraz.

When we set about scheduling new shows for 2012, I jumped at the chance to take on Alcatraz. You see, I can’t really recall a project that J.J. Abrams has been involved in that I didn’t enjoy. Unfamiliar with Abrams’ body of work? He was involved in the creation of FelicityAliasLost, and Fringe, produced Person of Interest, and directed Star Trek (the new movie) and Super 8.

Not too shabby, eh?

I find that every J.J. Abrams project I’ve watched seems to do one thing really well – characters.

And we all know how much I love my characters. But first, the story.

In 1963, Alcatraz was shut down and the prisoners were transferred due to unsafe conditions. Or at least, that is what the government told everyone. In reality, the prisoners and guards disappeared. Not escaped. Just, *poof*, gone.

Fast forward to present day to find something even stranger taking place. They are reappearing exactly as they were in 1963.  Dr. Hauser (Sam Neil, Jurassic Park) is the FBI agent running a secret task force to find these inmates and guards, referred to as 63s, with his own connections to what happened that day.

He enlists the help of Rebecca Madsen (Sarah Jones), a homicide detective for the SFPD who has grown up believing her grandfather was a guard at Alcatraz. She brings with the expertise of Dr. Soto (Jorge Garcia, Lost), a writer who is a bit of an expert on Alcatraz, as well as a comic book store owner.

I love the casting choices here, as well as the characters themselves. Sam Neil is authoritative, mysterious, and leaves you wondering if he is a good guy, bad guy, or something in between. Jorge Garcia is charming, adorable, and awkward. If you were a fan of Hurley on Lost, you’ll enjoy Dr. Soto here. Sarah Jones, a relative unknown from just down the road from me, conveys strength without being a one-dimensional character. I love the small details of her character, like her love of eating Dim Sum all the time or the green ’68 Fastback she drives, that make her seem like a real person.

The writers not only present us with interesting characters, but give us pieces of back story to explain who they are. Why would a successful PhD spend so much time with comic books? Why would a young homicide cop agree to work for this secret government organization? Questions like these get answers.

Of course, you’ll have a lot more questions that haven’t been answered yet. But that’s a good thing.

It’s still too soon to tell how successful the show will be, or how excited I will continue to be for the next episode. For now, it receives a solid MacTV rating. If you’ve enjoyed any of the Abrams’ catalog, give this one a try.

Are you watching Alcatraz? What do you think? Who is your favorite character? Remember, no spoilers in the comments! Feel free to discuss details with me on Twitter using the #watchwed hashtag, though. This is the type of show you may want to talk about. 

Now head over to Tiffany’s and see what she thinks of The Finder. 

Come back next week when we flip networks and review two of NBC’s new dramas: Smash and The Firm.  

Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future.

A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:

GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Tuesday Tech: How to Stay Safe and Secure Online

In my short time on this earth, I’ve seen a lot of changes in how people do business and share information, thanks to many advances in technology.

I’m a fan. I practically sleep with my phone and I am pretty sure that my relationship with Google is unhealthy.

Having said that, with all this wonderful progress comes a certain amount of danger.

I’ve read posts and received messages asking about scams, hoaxes, and so far, none of my friends have fallen prey.

In an effort to help out my many writer friends who find themselves spending more time plugged in than they ever expected, I took some time out to interview a securities expert on some best practices when online.

Ian Thompson. No Photo Available.

Without further delay, welcome Ian Thompson, CISSP, OSCP, MCSA, CCNA, Security + Expert, and many other letters of the alphabet I can’t remember. He’s spent a great deal of brainpower and time earning those letters. Thanks for joining us, Ian.

Please don’t hack me.

I only use my powers for good.

Mostly.

That’s a relief. Unfortunately, there are hackers out there that don’t use their powers for good. How does an average Joe keep their computer safe? Is that possible?

Sure, turn off your computer, unplug it, and place it in a vault. I think most people would sleep
well at night knowing that their computer is protected from unwanted access, don’t you?

Is this how the whole interview is going to go?

::grins::

Actually, some computers are turned off and placed in a vault to protect the information stored on them. But realistically that’s not possible for most.

Right. So for the “most” of us, what should we do?

To be reasonably protected, it is important to do a few things.

  • First, continually educate yourself about best security practices like you are doing right  now. Keep in mind that security is not a state that one can attain; it is a process that must be repeated frequently.
  • Second, you need to know what software is on your computer. Once you know what you have, make sure all of it is up to date and fully patched. Security products can assist in this, but a nice free tool called Secunia Personal Software Inspector is available to help you with this part of the process. Remember, new updates may come out daily. You can schedule this product to
    regularly scan your system and it will show you what needs to be updated and even point you to the updates to install. Always make sure Windows, Adobe, Java, and Office updates are applied.
  • Third, use a security product and keep it updated. Ideally it will have anti-virus, generic buffer overflow protection, intrusion prevention, and a firewall built into it. Companies like eEye Digital Security, and Symantec have products that contain these types of protection.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

Awesome. Thanks for the link for Secunia. We all like free stuff that helps protect us. Does that mean when a random window pops up telling us we need to download a virus protection, we should do it? I mean, I had one the other day saying it was Windows Defender. That sounds totally legit.

When in doubt, don’t. All sorts of malware is out there made to appear like legit software.

Hmmm. Ok. I totally knew that.

::tosses laptop out window::

How about this email here? Ebay needs me to confirm my log in information. I don’t want an interruption in my eBay service. I’m in the middle of bidding on some sweet Star Wars memorabilia.

This is an example of a social engineering attack called phishing. This attack is very common over email. For example someone may send you an email pretending to be a company or a bank cleverly asking you for some personal information, accounts/passwords, or enticing you to click a link.

Clicking the link is the last thing you would want to do. Let me repeat this, NEVER click a link in an email. It is always best to open a web browser and navigate to the site you wish to visit.

For example, this will allow you to go to the real site “ebay.com” and not the fake site “ebay.ee.com” (I just made up that URL). These fake sites may look like the real site but many times they will infect your computer with malware automatically even if you are full patched and up-to-date with your security product updates.

::gasp:: Really??

Yes, it’s true. Also, do NOT reply to these emails as that would confirm a valid email address and could also allow for further social engineering attempts. Keep this in mind, many advertisements, content on social networking sites, and other genuine sites link to malware too. Be very cautious about what you click on. Products that contain host intrusion protection and 0 day protection or generic buffer overflow protection can offer some protection from these types of attacks. Educating yourself will go very far in preventing social engineering attacks as people are always the weakest link.

We are the weakest link!

::rolls eyes::

What if I get an email from a friend saying they are stranded in a foreign country and need money?

Don’t send any.

A Nigerian prince who needs my banking info?

Not so much.

My email provider saying that they need me to confirm my account or they’ll close it?

Don’t click.

But the IRS is trying to send me a notice. Surely…

Don’t click.

But if I don’t act now, this refinancing deal is going to slip through my fingers.

Let it slip. Don’t click. Do you have that out of your system now?

I think so.

How about passwords? I have maybe a bajillion of them. I am pretty sure that if I just make them all “password123” that would be best. Then, I can remember them all easily, and no one will ever guess that.

Er, no. Not a good idea.

If you choose to set a password yourself follow some basic guidelines:

  • Make sure you never reuse a password. This can be hard to do but it keeps your other information from easy access if a password was found.
  • Make it something you can easily remember plus as long and complex as you can including upper/lower case letters, numbers, and special characters. Fifteen or more characters is especially good.
  • Do not include things that someone might find out about you such as pet names, important dates, and information found on your social networking sites.

Dude. We’ve met before, right? What makes you think I can remember a bajillion different passwords?

You don’t have to. The site lastpass.com is a great site and is safe to use. You can check out this pod-cast for more information.

Oh. That’s cool! And only a dollar a month. My brain thanks you, sir.

You’re, uh, she’s welcome…?

How about my phone? I don’t want to be stalked because I have technology in my pocket.

Well…

Sorry, hold on. I’m checking in at “My Crib” on Foursquare. And Facebook. And…

Yeah, you might want to skip that.

Oh.

::puts down phone::

::picks up phone::

Just because you aren’t intentionally “checking in” doesn’t mean your location isn’t being appended to what you upload. Geotagging allows a photo to be tagged with the GPS location your phone feeds it. But, you can turn off this setting. On your iPhone, we can do it here. [Settings, General, Location Services] You also want to look at the individual applications you load to see what their settings are.

::hands phone back::

I am now unstalkable!

Technically, no.

Having a GPS on your phone is not the only way you can be tracked. Your cell phone communicates with cell phone towers and your location can be tracked that way as well. You can find some good information on the eff.org site about this and other privacy issues.

I believe this quote says it all:

“Unfortunately, if you want to use your cell phone at all, avoiding the threat of this kind of real-time tracking is nearly impossible. That’s because the government can track your cell phone whenever it’s on, even if you aren’t making a call. The government can even track some cell phones when they are powered down, unless you have also removed the battery. So, once again, there is a security trade-off: the only way to eliminate the risk of location tracking is to leave the cell phone at home, or remove the battery.”

That sounds like an episode of CSI. Or Law & Order. Or…well, you get the idea.

Last question for today, although I make no guarantees it will be the last ever. Google has been telling me to read it’s new privacy terms. In basic terms, is there anything I need to know?

Very simply, I would not expect any privacy. If you don’t want your searches tied to your account then you would want to log out before you do any google searches. Remember, though, that your ISP can see what you’re doing and they can offer up that information.

So, Google has me in their clutches either way, huh?

Pretty much. That being said I still use google all the time. You can check out the this podcast if you want more details on the subject.

Well, that’s about all the time and space we have today. Thank you so much for joining us Ian.

No problem.

I’ll be sure to stalk you online, I MEAN, give you a call if my readers have more questions.

Riiiiiight.

Readers, what answers did you find helpful? If you have more questions or would like more clarification, please let me know!

I’m securing (no pun intended) exclusive rights to our expert as we speak. He’s not the only tech savvy fellow around these parts, so feel free to all sorts of questions!