Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – More of the Brilliant and Troubled

This week on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday, Tiffany and I take on criminals with Tiffany’s review of TNT’s The Closer and my look at the BBC drama, Luther.

Last week I talked about the quirky/troubled detective/consultant shows that seem oh-so-popular as of late.

Guess what? They have them across the pond, too. And no, I’m not talking about Sherlock (who, in its original form, is likely the father to these shows). I’m talking about Luther.

Detective Chief Inspector John Luther (Idris Elba) of the Serious Crime Unit is the focus of this psychological crime drama. DCI Luther is a crime fighter dealing with his own personal “demons”, a crumbling marriage, distrust from fellow officers and higher ups, yet he is ultimately the guy you want solving crimes because he is brilliant.

Sounds familiar?

Watch them think. And brood.

I couldn’t help but think of Detective Robert Goren of Law and Order: Criminal Intent when I began watching and researching this show.

Luther, however, is a grittier drama than Law and Order, and Idris Elba delivers a different take on the intelligent yet troubled detective.

Now, I’ve let it be known that I enjoy the troubled genius (do I need to list them again?) but that isn’t the only thing that drew me to check out Luther. Neil Cross, creator of Luther, was a lead writer for Spooks (MI-5, as it’s known here in the US), is an avid Doctor Who fan (he’s even written an episode!) and seems to have great taste in fiction, so it only made sense to check out more of his work.

If you like gritty psychological drama, Luther is definitely worth watching. Idris Elba even took home a Golden Globe for his performance in the show. And for those who aren’t looking for a huge commitment, there are only 10 episodes to catch up on, which can be found on Netflix.

While I can’t say that the concept is surprisingly original, the delivery is worth a GMacTV.

Have you seen Luther? Do you think it’s one you’ll be adding to the queue? Do you choose to watch shows based on the creators/writers previous work?

Now, head over to Tiffany’s for more drama, with TNT’s The Closer. It’s down to the last few episodes, so see if Tiffany thinks it’s worth catching up.

What shows would you like to see reviewed here on Why It’s Worth a Watch? We’re still in scheduling talks during the summer, so get your suggestions in!

Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future.
A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:
GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Gladiators!

This week on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday, Tiffany and I revisit some of our simmering series, letting you know if continued viewing gave these shows a place in our queue, or knocked them out indefinitely. Tiffany returns to the drama of Missing, while I cozy up to Scandal.

In my previous review, I mentioned that hearing the words “political drama” set the bar high, with my previous love of The West Wing. It’s unfair to judge Scandal up against this show, particularly because it just isn’t that kind of show. So, I begin this revisit by saying that this show is not West Wing.

But that’s not a bad thing.

After viewing a few more episodes of Scandal, I’ve had a chance to learn more about the characters. Yes, the mystery behind the storylines, the “scandals”, are a huge part of the show, but the characters are what sells them.

Olivia (Kerry Washington) and her crew refer to themselves as gladiator
s more than once in the show, and as the show moves along, that description is proving true. Not solely because they are so often engaged in battle, but like a true warrior, they’ve experienced it. They come to the fight with wounds and losses that make them who they are, and make them ready to go to war for others.

This team of fixers, a group of people who obviously have serious talent, is a group of people who are also seriously flawed. We are still learning about each characters back story, but every glimpse makes them that much more interesting.

For example, in Episode 5, you’ll get a much stronger picture of who Huck (Guillermo Diaz) is and how his past informs his decisions to act in the present. His past is not pretty and let me just say, that is the episode that really sold me, so if you are on the fence, see it through.

Then there’s my pal Josh Malina in the role of DA, David Rosen. I was worried he’d end up the typical overzealous, by-the-book authority figure who gets in the way of real good being done. He isn’t that guy. Fingers crossed they continue to make him so much more. (Especially if it means more screen time for Malina. Have I mentioned I’m a fan? No?)

There are still elements and characters I am not totally sold on, but the show has given me enough to keep me looking for the next episode.

Vague enough for you? I know. I’m sorry. But I can’t bear to give away some of the surprises the show has delivered so far.

That’s right. I used the word delivered, which means that I am taking this one off the back burner and promoting it to MacTV. Time will tell if it gets a stronger position in my queue, but currently it definitely satisfies and has me coming back for more.

Are you watching Scandal? Is hearing about awesome, yet flawed characters enough to get you watching? Who’s your favorite on the show?

Now click over to Tiffany’s blog to find out if Missing has her hooked.

Come back next week when we review two of the USA Network’s dramas – the new series,Common Law, and the sophomore surprise, Fairly Legal.

As always, don’t forget to find us on Twitter (#watchwed) and talk TV. We love hearing what shows you think are worth a watch, and worth a review here!

A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:

GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Parenthood

This week Tiffany and I review two of TV’s top dramas on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday: the returning favorite, Parenthood, and the new smash hit, Revenge.

I’ve complained once or twice about televisions depiction of family: the dopey father, shrill mothers, and bratty know-it-all children. Parenthood manages to present an image of family in several ways, none of them being the trite formula above.

The show follows the large Braverman family. Zeke (Craig T Nelson) and Camille (Bonnie Bedelia) are the parents of four grown children: Adam, Sara, Crosby, and Julia. Each of these children offer the opportunity to examine different aspects of the family dynamic.

Adam (Peter Krause), the eldest, is the responsible, successful, and happily married to his equally capable wife Kristina (Monica Potter) They have two children (as the series begins) Haddie and Max. Haddie is a fairly good teenager, but they find themselves entering new territory as their teenage daughter starts making changes that teenagers often do. To add to the madness in their home, the family discovers that their younger son, Max, has Asperger’s.

Sara (Lauren Graham), the next in line, seems to have taken the more free-spirited track in life, landing her back at home with her parents and two children, Amber, a teen who seems to be taking after her mother a little too much, and the very quiet younger brother, Drew.

Crosby (Dax Shepherd) is a small time record producer living on a houseboat, who also takes after the more free-spirited side of the family.  This life results in discovering he has a five year old son, Jabbar, when a former fling comes back to town to introduce them.

Last in line is Julia (Erika Christensen), a very together and successful corporate lawyer. Her husband, Joel (Sam Jaeger), is a stay-at-home Dad to their somewhat precocious only child, Sydney.

 

Got all that?

Now with all those characters, I thought for sure as this show began that many would be flat, one-dimensional. In reality, the writers have done a solid job giving each individual depth. What constantly amazes me is how the actors are able to act in a way that convinces you that these people are actually related. Even the smallest mannerisms can be seen from parent to child. Mae Whitman (who plays Amber) in particular is a stand out in how she can be a fully developed character of her own, but at the same time echo pieces of her fictional mother throughout the show.

The stories are varied, giving everyone watching the opportunity to relate somehow. Single parenting from both a full time and part time perspective, a full time mother dealing with a desire to have a career again, a full time dad coping with taking on the duties that are generally assumed to be a mom’s, grandparents speaking up (or standing aside) on issues involving their grandchildren; chances are, you’ll see yourself in one of these characters.

One aspect that has garnered both praise and criticism is the show’s depiction of Max (Max Burkholder), a child with Asperger’s. It should be noted that the creator of the show, Jason Katims (Friday Night Lights), based the character on his son, who also has Asperger’s. A behavioral psychologist is also consulted in the writing of Max’s scenes, and other consultants are brought in for more intense ones. My experience with Asperger’s is limited to a student I had some time ago, so I couldn’t tell you how accurate the show’s depiction is, but I can tell you that it certainly feels real, and I do appreciate the writer’s attempts at an accurate portrayal.

But what do I think of the show overall? Every week, I find myself getting teary. Whether it is a situation that I can directly relate to, or one that the actors and writers craft so well I can’t help but be emotionally invested, I’m glued to the screen.

Are the storylines action-packed? Not really. But they deliver a picture of family life, parenthood in particular, with all its faults and ultimately, its beauty.

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I come from a large, close family, or perhaps it is because I look forward to having a good cry with this show each week, I have to give it a GTV. A home cooked meal at a big table, surrounded by family you love.

Do you watch Parenthood? Which character do you find yourself relating to most? What situations really tug at your heart?

Don’t forget to see what Tiffany thinks of ABC’s Revenge.

Come back next week when we’ll have more TV for you!

Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag on Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future. 


A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:

GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth A Watch Wednesday – These Are Their Stories

As 2011 winds down, so does the need to tell you about any new programming on the TV. As a matter of fact, a lot of shows start showing reruns, leaving our DVR queue a little quiet.

This week, Tiffany and I share a few of our standby shows. They’re the ones we turn on while we fold endless piles of laundry, bake cupcakes, or pretend to get something done in the house.

My pick is one of a large and successful franchise: Law and Order. Specifically, Law & Order: Criminal Intent.

The original Law & Order has been around since 1990, and at the time of its final episode last year it was the longest running crime drama around. Criminal Intent began in 2001 and ended just this past May. While not as long running as the original, it definitely held its own with a ten year run, and for this TV watcher, it was the one that kept me tuned in.

Where the original series focused on the police catching criminals and the prosecutors bringing them to justice, L&O:CI paid more attention to the motives of the criminals. The show spent time singling out the criminal, showing what drove them, and generally ended with a confession. Unlike the other L&O series, Criminal Intent did not focus on the prosecutorial element.

So, for a TV viewer who likes good court case viewing, what made me choose the one L&O that shies away from the courtroom?

Simply put, Detective Robert Goren. The primary detectives working cases during the length of the series are Goren and Eames. Goren is a detective who has pays close attention to minor details, has a wide array of knowledge, and possesses a special knack for getting into the head (and often, under the skin) of the criminals he encounters.

Regular readers know how much I love the guys with a gift – Shawn Spencer, Dr. House, Patrick Jane – so it should come as no surprise that the character of Detective Goren holds a special place in my TV heart. After all, it is rumored that his character, like House, is based on Sherlock Holmes.

As the series continued, elements of his life are very slowly revealed that bring to light how he could be so good at what he does, and why he isn’t always appreciated for it. As a matter of fact, this is an element of CI I didn’t expect to appreciate; the characters personal lives are rarely touched on in the show.

Aside from loving the character, I will admit that the fact that he is played by the brilliant Vincent D’Onofrio is the biggest reason that this show is on regular rotation in my house. Whether he’s doing Kubrick, playing a demented serial killer, a tormented writer*, or an alien, I’ve never been disappointed with him in any role. Detective Goren’s character is occasionally over the top in interrogations, but D’Onofrio’s delivery keeps me watching.

While I wasn’t thrilled when the show added another set of detectives to share the caseload, it was definitely still watchable, particularly with actors like Chris Noth joining the cast for a few seasons.

Is this show an amazing feat of writing? No. The cases are often predictable, and some lines are occasionally cheesy, which is why I give this show the MacTV rating. But just like my mac n’ cheese, I’ll eat it by the bowlful, even the cheap kind from the box. Low on the nutritional value, but it will forever be a pantry staple.

Given my earlier post, I opted for a "mature" photo here.

And yes, I did, and probably forever will, have a bit of a crush on Mr. D’Onofrio.

Are you a fan of any of the L&O franchise? Does anyone share my admiration for the “actor’s actor”, Vincent D’Onofrio? What’s your laundry day go to?

Now click over to Tiffany’s blog and find out what she tunes in to when the household chores are piling up.

Come back next week to see what we have cooking!

Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future.

*The Whole Wide World is based on the memoirs of Novalyne Price, following her relationship with the writer Robert Howard, creator of Conan the Barbarian. Random trivia time: Renee Zellweger thanked him when she accepted her Oscar for Cold Mountain. This movie is the reason why.

A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:

GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech