Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Do No Harm, NBC

WARNING: The following post contains liberal use of CAPS and bold letters.

 

This week on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday, Tiffany and I once again go head to head, bringing you the latest in new TV. This week, we check out NBC’s new drama, Do No Harm.

Do No Harm stars Steven Pasquale as…wait. Starred. I should say “starred” not “stars”.

do-no-harm-canceled-by-nbc-after-two-episodes

Dude. They cancelled us. We have the sads.

Because it’s already been cancelled.

TWO. EPISODES. IN.

Yes, ladies and gentles, this show has the awkward distinction of being the lowest-rated scripted premiere in the HISTORY of the big four.

It must have been horrible, right?

Well…

Here’s the thing. By the time I got a chance to sit down and watch the show, I already knew about the cancellation. So, it was hard for me to be overly critical. If this were a real review, I probably would have made unfair comparisons to the BBC’s Jekyll (unfair, because, well, it’s the BBC). But, why kick a man while he’s down, right?

The premise to the show had promise. The main character, Dr. Jason Cole (Stephen Pasquale) has DID (dissociative identity disorder) but it manifests in a unique way. His alter, who goes by the name Ian Price, shows up at the same time every night – 8: 25 PM – and stays for 12 hours. Dr. Cole has little to no memory of what his other personality does, but he does know that he is a horrible person.

Because of this, it seems that he’s enlisted the help of a fellow doctor (Lin-Manuel Miranda) in creating a drug that suppresses his other half. It’s worked for a while, but they discover that Cole/Price has become immune to the drug.

The alter, angry after being suppressed for so long, is out for revenge on Cole.

And Cole, understandably, wants to kill Price.

It’s a Jekyll and Hyde-like tale. And I happen to enjoy Jekyll/Hyde stories. I also find DID interesting subject matter, even if this portrayal is over the top.

But, I’ll never know if this story would have been developed well, if Pasquale’s subtle shift between Cole and Price would have been refreshing or not enough, because the network didn’t give me a chance.

They did what they had to, right? If a show isn’t getting ratings, it gets the ax.

Here’s the thing. Not that I know anything about anything, but I get the feeling that networks haven’t caught up with the new generation of “TV” watchers. And by TV, I mean the countless numbers of people who watch their programs after the fact.

Show of hands: How many of you watch a show the second it comes on? There are a fair amount of viewers who are watching new shows On Demand, days later on their DVR, or online via network websites or Hulu.

Are networks accounting for these people?

I probably would have given Do No Harm a chance, honestly. But I don’t think my viewing figures are being considered.

Networks – catch up with the times. Find a new way to track your viewership. Put more of your marketing dollars into social media and online advertising. Offer sneak peeks (some have done this) of pilots to Social Media influencers who can get online viewers excited about the show.

Leverage the interwebs!!

And again, I don’t understand how things work, but if you’ve ALREADY filmed a certain number of episodes, why not air them all if all you are going to replace it with are RERUNS of another show? (Yes, they are going to air previously aired episodes of Law and Order: SVU.)

OH, OH! And stop premiering shows in timeslots where you historically underperform. NBC has been sucking wind in the 10 o’ clock time slot since, what, ER? Not to mention that the timeslot is occupied by Scandal – a HUGELY successful drama on ABC, and Elementary on CBS, which has also been doing well.

Go home, NBC, you're DRUNK.

Go home, NBC, you’re DRUNK.

A lot of folks have DVRs that only let them records TWO things. Sticking yourself in a time slot already inhabited by a couple of strong shows is kind of asking for horrible ratings, isn’t it?

AND…AND! How about you give the show a stronger lead-in? Sure, Thursday night comedies on NBC were once a strong bunch, but with The Office nearing it’s end, 30 Rock done, and the addition of the absolutely horrid 1600 Penn, you can’t expect viewers to stick around for an unknown drama.

1600 Penn. ::shudder::

How is it, exactly, that you’ve cancelled Do No Harm after two episodes and not this waste of TV space?

Sigh.

No ratings today. I’m guessing Do No Harm would have received an SSTV from me. But apparently NBC wants microwave programming.

Enjoy your hot pockets.

I don’t even know what I’m saying anymore.

Come back next week when I’m less angry at the world. Or, you know, NBC.

Don’t forget to see what Tiffany has to say about this whole debacle!

(PS – I am really disappointed that the cancellation means I don’t get to see more Lin-Manuel Miranda. For those who don’t know, he is the uber-talented guy behind the musical In the Heights, and had a memorable guest appearance on House)

Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future.
A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:
GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV):It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (NyQuil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

 

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – A Fairy Tale Showdown

This week on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday, we are having a fairy tale showdown! In the past, Tiffany and I gave our reviews of Grimm and Once Upon a Time. This week, we are following up on our thoughts by putting the two shows head to head. After all, they both have fairy tale roots, so why not have a proper battle?

In this corner…

Once Upon a Time. From the creators of Lost, Once Upon a Time is the over-analytical TV watcher’s dream. With scenes from modern-day Storybrooke, a small town in Maine where these fairy tale characters have been whisked away to without memory of their fairy tale lives, and flashes to their fairy tale lives and what led up to the curse stranding them in Maine, the show definitely has a Lost-ish feel.

His name is Neil Cassidy, people. NEIL CASSIDY.

Not only that, but there are constantly tiny clues throughout the show, leaving those who love cooking up complex theories in heaven.

I’m a big fan of that sort of thing. While I didn’t care for the ending of Lost, I did enjoy watching the series for all those small details, and trying to decipher what they meant. (Did the fact that several character names were the same as past philosophers mean anything? How about those numbers? Wait, is that a polar bear?)

Once Upon a Time totally delivers on this kind of fun. Don’t believe me? Ask me to tell you who I think Emma’s past partner in crime really is, and more importantly, WHY. Or how I guessed who Dr. Whale really is. (Seriously. Ask.)

 

In the other corner…

Grimm, from the outside, seems to be a police procedural with a twist. Our main character, Nick Berkhardt (David Giuntoli), is a detective who finds out that he is a Grimm. He also finds out that they were much more than storytellers. Throughout history, Grimms hunted and killed Wesen.

Wesen concept art

What’s a Wesen? Wesen is the group name for all the different creatures we know from the various tales told by the Grimms. What the non-Grimms among of us don’t know is that Wesen exist all around us, in human form.

Grimm fairy tales tend to be among my favorites, as they are darker and more serious than the Disney-fied versions most of us grow up with, so the show’s decision to keep with the true nature of these tales definitely appealed to me.

So, it would seem there are reasons for me to like them both. Who wins?

Once Upon a Time, while giving me an opportunity to super geek-it-up and have discussions about Kerouac and other literary folks, hasn’t really been doing it for me this season. Their introduction of some new princesses (I am still trying decide if these are awful actresses or the victims of bad writing) has me snoring, and this season is feeling a bit desperate – bad CGI, etc. I no longer find myself rushing to Hulu the next morning to watch, a very telling sign.

Grimm, on the other hand, started slowly for me. I enjoy police procedurals, and figured I would enjoy the show, but not be wrapped up in a long term story  line. Boy, was I wrong. There is a lot more going on than crimes committed by characters from old tales and it definitely has me eager for the next episode.

So, it may surprise everyone who knows me, but the winner for me is: Grimm.

 

What about you? Are you watching both? Which is your favorite? Do you want to talk OUAT theories with me? (Really. Let’s do this.)

 

Now, head over to Tiffany’s and see if this battle is a tie, or if Grimm takes home victory.

Come back next week when we review something….  Stay tuned!
Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future.
A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:
GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV):It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (NyQuil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Chicago Fire

This week on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday, Tiffany and I decided that it was high time that we try something a little different.

As regular readers know, each week we review what’s new so you can determine what’s worth watching. Tiffany and I tend to have fairly different tastes, so we divvy up the current viewing schedule accordingly.

But this week, we’ve decided to watch the same show and deliver our reviews together.

No “pre-game” chatting, no checking the other kid’s answers before turning it in. Both of our views sent out into the blogosphere for you to compare/contrast to your heart’s content.

Will this week’s pick, Chicago Fire, be a polarizing factor for the WatchWed duo?

Chicago Fire is the latest in Dick Wolf’s lengthy production list. Who’s Dick Wolf? If you just asked that question, you haven’t turned on a television in quite some time. He’s the man behind this sound:

Mr. Wolf is branching out beyond cops and lawyers into new territory. Or newish.

Enter the firefighters! And a couple of paramedics. Basically, anyone who hangs at the fire station.

The story begins with the death of one of the firefighters, a death that sets the stage for tension between two main characters, Lieutenant Matthew Casey (Jesse Spencer) and Lieutenant Kelly Severide (Taylor Kinney).

Casey is in charge of Truck 81, while Casey heads up Rescue Squad 3, and all the members dwell together in the same station, along with two female paramedics (of Ambulance 61).

There are fires. There are good-looking people who like other good-looking people who may or may not be engaged to some other good-looking people.

Drama and stuff ensues.

Part of me wants to let out a “meh” and move on.

Especially after the pilot dumped a ton in one episode. [Sidenote: TV writers…stop with the “pilot dumping” already! When you pull out a script and WRITEALLTHETHINGS like a crazy person, I don’t have enough time to engage with the characters or story or anything. Save some for later.]

And yet…

I do like several of the characters, as well as the actors playing them. Jesse Spencer (yes, that’s the guy from House, sans Aussie accent) makes me adore the stand-up, good guy Lt. Casey, and despite what looked like a vanilla good guy beginning, his character seems to be getting a more interesting storyline. Definitely less vanilla.

His girlfriend, played perfectly by Teri Reeves (of the Hulu series Battleground – why haven’t you watched it yet?!) is a character I really hope the writers take the time to develop. After all, a doctor in a relationship with a firefighter offers up an interesting dynamic.

Christopher Hermann (David Eigenberg), a member of Truck 81, is another character I hope to see more of. Something about his down to earth nature makes him more believable (read: relatable) than characters like Severride, who at this point is still strictly in the brooding eye candy category – which doesn’t really do anything for me.

In addition to liking a few of the actors and the characters they play, there might be a hole that this show is filling for me.

Remember the days of E.R.? I was a fan. Not a rabid MUST WATCH fan, but I did watch every episode. And sometimes I cried. And sometimes I did enjoy the eye candy. (Hello, George Clooney? Goran Visnjic?) It wasn’t that the writing blew me away, or that there was some amazing plot line that kept me watching. I mean, let’s be honest, the show recycled their own story lines at one point.

I kept watching because I grew to like the people. And I especially liked watching them do heroic things and save lives and all that sappy stuff.

I think Chicago Fire has the potential to slide in that slot that’s been open since ER’s been gone.

Also, I like fire.

So, for now, I am giving Chicago Fire an SSTV, with the knowledge that it’s potentially JFTV. It’s still simmering for me, but I think it will be that candy bar in the back of the drawer I can’t resist. It may be low on substance, but that won’t stop me from seeking it out. The actors seem to have a solid grasp on how to make at least that happen. It’s in the writers’ hands now.

Writers – make it happen.

How about you? Were you a fan of the ER drama back in the day? Have you checked out Chicago Fire? Does it have what it takes to secure a spot in your viewing queue?

Now, head over to Tiffany’s and see what her take is on Chicago Fire. Was she able to give it more than a simmering rating?

Come back next week when Amber and I review something… we’re thinking about changing things up again and trying something else that we’ve never done before.  Don’t forget to send us yours suggestions!
Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future.
A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:
GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV)Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesdays – Guys With…::snore::

With all of the new TV programs airing this fall, Tiffany and I have had a ton of homework to do…  This week, we tuned in and watched two of the most recent additions to the comedy lineups for our Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday reviews—NBC’s Guys with Kids and ABC’s The Neighbors.

I feel the need to preface this review with the following information: as I type this, I am battling an ear infection. If you’ve never had one, imagine coupling partial deafness with the dental pain.

Yeah. Awesome.

It stands to reason that I MAY just be a bit crankier than usual given the circumstances. I should also note  that I watched this show pre-infection, so, take that as you will.

Guys With Kids revolves around the lives of three guys played by Jesse Bradford, Anthony Anderson, and Zach Cregger. Each man has kids, although in slightly different situations, Chris (Bradford) is newly divorced with a baby, Gary (Anderson) is a married stay-at-home-dad with four boys (a set of twins among them), and Nick (Cregger) is married with a little girl and baby boy.

Conversations between the three friends often take place at a local bar, one they frequent with their babies in tow, strapped to their chests in non-branded Baby Bjorns.

The idea, I guess, is that fathering is funny.

And I’m not saying parenting overall isn’t. There are plenty of opportunities for laughs. (If you’ve ever had a baby pee in your face, you know humor is a key element in parenting.)

This show, however, missed the mark when it comes to humor. Which is problematic, since, you know, it is a sitcom. It’s also a big let down, given that Jimmy Fallon and one of the creators of The Office are involved in the show’s creation. (For the record, I’ve been a fan of The Office in the past, and enjoy Fallon.)

Adding insult to injury is the voice that tells us at the beginning of the show that this show is being taped in front of a live studio audience. If that canned laughter does actually come from the live audience, I fear for our future.

This show just isn’t funny. I watched three episodes, hoping that maybe the pilot was a fluke. After all, there are shows that need time to come into their own. (I would have never guessed that I would love Parks and Rec the way I do based on the pilot.) Sadly, I didn’t laugh.

And the acting is so…overdone. I don’t blame the actors for that one. I feel like that is the direction they are getting. “If you act like the joke is hilarious, the audience will believe you!” Yeah. Not so much.

I will say this much. One, I can’t remember any instances (at least in those first few eps) that made me want to cover my little guy’s ears. It’s fairly rare that I can watch anything that comes on after 8 PM without worrying about what my three year old is hearing. So, if NBC’s intent is to bring back the family sitcom, I give it props for trying.

But I’d like them to try hard enough that the show is worth watching. At least in the days of Full House and the like, the show was cheesy but could be funny to a kid, even some adults. This show just wasn’t funny.

The only other thing about the show that stood out for me was Zach Cregger. For any of you who remember Ryan Reynolds from his sitcom days (Two Guys, A Girl, and a Pizza Place), Zach reminds me a lot of him. Now, I know most ladies love Ryan Reynolds for other reasons, but I always loved the funny version of him way more than the “I just did a thousand crunches shirtless” version. So, I find Mr. Cregger’s presence comforting.

In the end, even Mr. Cregger couldn’t compel me to watch this show. Unless NBC is listening and makes some serious changes, I’m afraid this is some LOTV – liver and onions. Which would probably make Cregger the promise of bacon.

Did you watch Guys With Kids? What did you think? Are my comedy standards set far too high? Did you miss the show? You can catch all the episodes on Hulu.

Now head over to Tiffany’s blog and see what she thinks of another new sitcom, Neighbors. Has TV forgotten how to create comedy?

Come back next week when we return with an installment of Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday unlike any other… we’re reviewing the same show for the very first time!  Will we agree or disagree after watching Chicago Fire?
Remember to stop by the #watchwed hashtag in Twitter to discuss any of today’s reviews, or to mention any television programs that you’d like to see on Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday in the future.
And now, for something funny that involves both Jimmy Fallon and old school sitcoms, I bring you, THIS:

A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:
GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
GMacTV (Gourmet MacNCheese TV): A combination of fine wine and comfort food
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
TBPTV (Twice Baked Potato TV): Part gourmet and delicious, while absolutely horrible for our cholesterol
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV)Do we really have to explain? Blech